Artificial intelligence permeates professional tools everywhere. Yet many organizations share a persistent concern: what happens to our data? How can we leverage an AI assistant without feeding foreign platforms or compromising privacy standards?
With Euria, Infomaniak addresses these questions directly. This Swiss hosting and cloud provider unveils an AI assistant developed and operated within Swiss data centers, powered entirely by renewable energy sources. The company emphasizes a particularly anticipated commitment: user data does not contribute to model training.
Euria in practice: understanding the tool
Euria operates as a versatile AI assistant, designed to facilitate content creation, summarization, rephrasing, analysis, and information retrieval.
You can provide it with:
– various texts (briefings, emails, meeting minutes, personal notes),
– complete documents (to identify essential elements),
– audio files (for transcription purposes),
– questions requiring thorough research or structured synthesis.
The ambition is not to replace your existing business tools. Rather, the objective focuses on optimizing recurring tasks: developing initial drafts, organizing analyses, adapting content across different formats.
Euria’s distinctive advantages: Swiss location and sustainability
Infomaniak’s strategy rests on two main pillars: territorial anchoring and environmental commitment.
Data centers located in Switzerland
Euria relies on infrastructure hosted within Swiss data centers. For decision-makers, this location offers concrete organizational benefits:
– a legal environment distinct from American tech giants,
– increased transparency regarding hosting and subcontracting chains,
– alignment with digital sovereignty initiatives or external dependency reduction efforts.
However, “hosted in Switzerland” represents favorable context, not automatic guarantee. Evaluating use cases and data types shared remains essential.
100% renewable energy supply
Infomaniak announces that its data centers operate exclusively through renewable energy sources. For organizations concerned about their digital footprint, this criterion provides valuable clarity: the infrastructure powering the AI assistant prioritizes electricity consumption covered by sustainable sources.
This does not automatically neutralize AI’s impact, but constitutes a tangible indicator in a sector where energy comparisons often remain opaque.
Privacy: announced commitments and their implications
The most notable promise surrounding Euria concerns data protection: user data would not serve to train models.
For executives, this assurance addresses a recurring concern: “If we submit an internal document, will it contribute to improving a publicly accessible model?” Infomaniak’s announcement aims to dispel this worry.
“Ephemeral” functionality
Euria also offers an ephemeral mode. The principle remains straightforward: limit conversation and file retention, reducing stored traces and history.
However, this does not exempt organizations from adopting sound internal practices. An AI assistant requires governance, just like email systems or shared storage spaces.
Practical recommendations to implement
Even with an AI assistant designed to preserve confidentiality, your internal policy remains decisive. Several simple rules to implement:
– Avoid transmitting sensitive personal data without absolute necessity.
– Anonymize excerpts (names, addresses, identifiers) before analysis.
– Distinguish usage types: drafts on one side, finalized and validated documents on the other.
– Maintain systematic human validation for external content (press releases, web pages, contractual documents).
Practical features: transcription, document analysis, research
Euria presents itself as a versatile assistant. Three features deserve particular attention for non-technical teams.
1) Audio file transcription
Concrete scenarios: team meetings, interviews, executive committees, collaborative workshops. The benefit extends beyond obtaining text, saving time on:
– formatting and cleanup,
– extracting decisions made,
– establishing action item lists.
Recommended approach: request transcription accompanied by structured summary (objectives / decisions / actions / risks / pending questions).
2) Document analysis
For website owners, agencies, or institutions, this function often represents genuine value: transforming PDFs or lengthy documents into actionable elements.
Usage examples:
– synthesize a strategic note into ten key points,
– identify obligations within specification documents,
– compare two text versions (modifications, missing elements),
– develop FAQ sections from information documents.
3) Research and synthesis
Assisted research can facilitate topic exploration: emerging trends, precise definitions, sector best practices. The objective is not blind trust in AI, but obtaining initial reflection structure.
Useful reflex: systematically request retained assumptions, uncertainty areas, and cross-check critical information.
Impact for websites and agencies
Although Euria is not a WordPress extension, an AI assistant directly influences website production and maintenance.
For website owners
– Develop page drafts (services, FAQs, local pages), then have them reviewed and adapted.
– Convert internal documents (commercial offers, brochures) into more accessible web content.
– Standardize responses to recurring requests (technical support, practical information), while maintaining human validation.
For agencies
– Accelerate scoping phases: objective reformulation, meeting synthesis, persona clarification.
– Generate content variants (headlines, hooks, editorial angles) without wasting time.
– Structure audits: checklists, action plans, priority hierarchization.
The challenge rarely involves “producing more.” Rather, it concerns “producing better, faster, and more consistently.”
Vigilance points before adoption
Before deploying an AI assistant within an organization, even one that is “Swiss” and privacy-oriented, several pragmatic questions merit reflection:
– Who can access it? (user accounts, access rights, team separation)
– What data types are authorized? (clear rules, concrete examples)
– What uses are prohibited? (HR data, health information, sensitive files)
– What validations apply? (external publications, official documents)
– What archiving policy? (need to preserve or conversely to delete)
These organizational decisions, more than the tool itself, often determine deployment success.
Euria fits within a clear trend: seeking AI assistants more compatible with confidentiality, traceability, and environmental impact requirements. For organizations wanting to experiment with AI without externalizing everything to American platforms, Infomaniak’s approach (Switzerland, renewable energy, non-training commitment) deserves attention.
Need to clarify proper AI assistant usage within your organization and its impact on your WordPress production? We can discuss this based on your specific context, without technical jargon.
Source: https://news.infomaniak.com/en/euria-sovereign-ai-assistant/